March 4, 2014
Hood Museum of
Art at Dartmouth College
by Dariya Apsenbetova
First
when you look at this painting you probably notice the woman’s face and her
outfit. Then you are looking at the place and what is she doing. The little
details that surround the woman tell a person that the woman is not from the
upper class. Her hairstyle, which is tied, and her peasant’s dress support this
idea. The woman is doing laundry and note the thin sheen of sweat on the
woman’s arms, her wet, ruddy, muscular hands, and the superb rendering of all
the different fabrics, both wet and dry, as well as the various textures and
sheens of all the woods and metals on display. However, her smiling face tells
that she is happy when she is doing that. Looks like she is saying: “Look how
it’s done. The women’s work.” On the background you can notice the clothes
washed in the basin (lights first, followed by the colors with dyes that might
run). The crumpled clothes yet to be washed, suds bucket, washboard, and the
clothespins for drying. It is very interesting to know that in the picture, the
author drew herself. Lilly Spencer illustrated herself washing and, in fact,
she had 13 children and a husband. Unbelievably, she managed just to support
them all with her painting. This picture somehow gives the viewer positive
emotions and warmth because the colors are warm (red, yellow, brown) and the
face itself is joyful with all the little wrinkles between her nose and her
eyes. These wrinkles that transform a cat’s face when it snarls and her eyes
watering with mirth. The whole effect is not beautiful, but it’s something
better. The overall message of this painting, I think, is that Spencer wants to
show us that she likes this Jolly Washerwoman and even though she, Spencer, a
mother of 13 children who was against all the odds, managed to build her career
by doing something she had a real talent for — was always loved in return.
Other places on the Net the model is described as Spencer Martin's maid. What's the source for the identification as a self-portrait? Or for that matter, the other version?
ReplyDelete